0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
smith needed anyone to make thoas arguments it was going to be mike dreeben. >> was jack smith there today? >> he was at the counsel table today. >> you said some justices appeared open to this idea, the argument being made by the former president's legal team. which justices? >> there were a few, actually. two of trump's own appointees seemed more receptive to the arguments than perhaps anyone else on the court. particularly justice brett kavanaugh was very concerned about the idea of letting criminal prosecutions go forward over actions taken by the president. he continually floated this idea, this rule that would s that unless a statute specifically mentions the president, that then it can't be applied against hem. that is a slight variation on the whole question of immunity but it would get their via a different rout and would essentially mean the end of jack smith's case. neil gorsuch moated the possibility of this situation, he said would lead to just every president pardoning themselves on the way out of office which is a novel and kind of dangerous situation for the court to
smith needed anyone to make thoas arguments it was going to be mike dreeben. >> was jack smith there today? >> he was at the counsel table today. >> you said some justices appeared open to this idea, the argument being made by the former president's legal team. which justices? >> there were a few, actually. two of trump's own appointees seemed more receptive to the arguments than perhaps anyone else on the court. particularly justice brett kavanaugh was very concerned...
54
54
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 54
favorite 0
quote 1
he put himself on that team to go after trump and now on the jack smith and arguing the case for jack smith today. very interesting. >> dana: we are going to have a chance at 10:00 a.m. to hear the justices and the argument. you will be inside. so you know the justices well and pay attention to a lot of this. what are you listening for today? is there anyone in particular you are expecting to weigh in heavily? >> you know i'll be keeping an eye on the chief justice. he tries to guide the court with a narrow hand in many cases, incrementally. if they find there is some scope of immunity for these particular actions where do they set the boundaries? i think listening to the questions about whether they are open to that issue of immunity and how far it might go. if we see who is trying to probe what the outer boundaries of that would be, these arguments are set for an hour but nothing else on the docket today. i expect we go well beyond that. this is a moment in history for the justices to decide. we don't know what the vote was to take up the case, who voted yes or no or who wants to he
he put himself on that team to go after trump and now on the jack smith and arguing the case for jack smith today. very interesting. >> dana: we are going to have a chance at 10:00 a.m. to hear the justices and the argument. you will be inside. so you know the justices well and pay attention to a lot of this. what are you listening for today? is there anyone in particular you are expecting to weigh in heavily? >> you know i'll be keeping an eye on the chief justice. he tries to...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KPIX
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
but that is what special counsel jack smith asked for. he actually said the justices should expedite this case so they can make a decision by the end of the term, so that is what they are going to do. whether or not this is going to go past too long before intervention, it will happen in november, that will be up to how the court writes it. there will still be decisions left for lower courts to resolve. norah? >> norah: all right, really interesting. jan crawford, thank you. instead of being at those supreme court hearings, donald trump was in a courthouse in lower manhattan for his so-called hush money trial. that's where we find cbs's robert costa. good evening, robert. >> reporter: good evening, norah. former president donald trump isn't attacking david pecker, the former publisher of the "national enquirer," just yet, but pecker's testimony today here in lower manhattan the direct and trump, offering new details about an alleged catch and kill operation to influence the 2016 election. this morning, former president trump weighed in on
but that is what special counsel jack smith asked for. he actually said the justices should expedite this case so they can make a decision by the end of the term, so that is what they are going to do. whether or not this is going to go past too long before intervention, it will happen in november, that will be up to how the court writes it. there will still be decisions left for lower courts to resolve. norah? >> norah: all right, really interesting. jan crawford, thank you. instead of...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the real conspiracy here is jack smith, alvin bragg, and frankly fani willis, all working too. inspire to impact the 2024 election. that is the real concern well, i hear the points you're making, although you are conflating di just separate sovereigns? >> obviously, jack smith, alvin bragg, fani willis, are separate entities entirely and the actual crimes charged against trump in the men, they're all democrats, laura, they're all democrats i hear i hear about the politics and what you're making. but the real issue here i want to refocus on the conversation about the concerns about immunity more broadly. and one of the reasons to answer your question, people do want the answer beforehand. i think as they want the transparency to decide who they would like to vote for it based on either an absence of or an actual criminal well record, but let's get back to the supreme court congress thinks i know this is a very important issue for you, but laura, but good transparency that they paid after president trump now for eight years, i mean that we know more about president trump than pro
the real conspiracy here is jack smith, alvin bragg, and frankly fani willis, all working too. inspire to impact the 2024 election. that is the real concern well, i hear the points you're making, although you are conflating di just separate sovereigns? >> obviously, jack smith, alvin bragg, fani willis, are separate entities entirely and the actual crimes charged against trump in the men, they're all democrats, laura, they're all democrats i hear i hear about the politics and what you're...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
smith has an option and i wonder if yes thought about it he could actually achieve what he wants to achieve , as sleazy as i think it is trying to mainly get a down and dirty conviction before the election if he did the following, a fee tomorrow had the grand jury reindict donald trump only charging private acts not acts that are immunized trump's own lawyer acknowledged publicly on the record that it would be constitutional permissible to indict and try a president for private acts and of the indictment as it exists today is a combination of jumble really of private acts and public acts so jack smith would probably have the option of going back and getting a new indictment and thereby moving the supreme court decision by simply taking the position that trump's lawyer made and using it as the basis for prosecuting he may lose that case obviously because i don't know whether there is enough in the private act to warrant a criminal prosecution but that is an option that i know i don't think he knew else has thought of so far that jack smith could do i don't want to put any ideas in hi
smith has an option and i wonder if yes thought about it he could actually achieve what he wants to achieve , as sleazy as i think it is trying to mainly get a down and dirty conviction before the election if he did the following, a fee tomorrow had the grand jury reindict donald trump only charging private acts not acts that are immunized trump's own lawyer acknowledged publicly on the record that it would be constitutional permissible to indict and try a president for private acts and of the...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
again, that's bad for jack smith. timeline. so if you're the former president, all you so we're looking for here is no bold action by the court. you don't want a decisive, sweeping decision that said the immunity. you want something either in the middle, four, four victory. i don't think any serious legal scholars think the court is going to come out and adopt an absolute immunity framework. but there is a real risk that they're going to do something in the middle at all. that's going to have this case dragging on. & you look at the timeline, will under so far the court has not moved quickly here. they have not act like this case is truly an emergency. so i don't suspect they're going to do so with their decision. >> even though a lot of it has gone under the label of expedited and emergencies but i guess those are all relative terms when it comes to the supreme as you guys well know, elliott, let's turn to arizona really quickly. is this indictment that happened overnight? is this the two-point version of georgia with the bigg
again, that's bad for jack smith. timeline. so if you're the former president, all you so we're looking for here is no bold action by the court. you don't want a decisive, sweeping decision that said the immunity. you want something either in the middle, four, four victory. i don't think any serious legal scholars think the court is going to come out and adopt an absolute immunity framework. but there is a real risk that they're going to do something in the middle at all. that's going to have...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KGO
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
lawyers for special counsel jack smith, who is prosecuting trump for those efforts, arguing that presidents are not above the law if they commit crimes. the justices acknowledging the case before them is not just about former president donald trump, but also about future presidents and the presidency itself. one critical question they're considering, whether a president can have immunity for an official act, but not his private conduct. abc's terry moran leads us off at the supreme court. >> reporter: at the heart of this case, donald trump's unprecedented claim. his lawyer telling the justices that presidents can never face criminal prosecution for anything they do in office that can be linked to their official duties. absolute immunity. >> without presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, there can be no presidency as we know it. >> reporter: the sheer magnitude of that claim hung over the courtroom. several justices acknowledging the stakes. >> this case has huge implications for the presidency, for the future of the presidency, for the future of the country, in my view. >> whatev
lawyers for special counsel jack smith, who is prosecuting trump for those efforts, arguing that presidents are not above the law if they commit crimes. the justices acknowledging the case before them is not just about former president donald trump, but also about future presidents and the presidency itself. one critical question they're considering, whether a president can have immunity for an official act, but not his private conduct. abc's terry moran leads us off at the supreme court....
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but that being said, you know, jack smith really want withs the try this case before the election. david yeah. he's salivating matt whitaker, thank you so much for being here. good seeing you. >> good sewing you. david: it is going to be a tough day on wall street at least after the opening bell. we've got all the futures down significantly. dow is down 484, nasdaq's down 316. the opening bell's next. ♪ this is how we roll ♪ (husband) we just want to have enough money for retirement. (wife) and travel to visit our grandchildren. (fisher investments) i understand. that's why at fisher investments we start by getting to know each other. so i can learn about your family, lifestyle, goals and needs, allowing us to tailor your portfolio. (wife) what about commission-based products? (fisher investments) we don't sell those. we're a fiduciary, obligated to act in your best interest. (husband) so how do your management fees work? (fisher investments) we have a transparent fee, structured so we do better when you do better. at fisher investments, we're clearly different. everybody wants
but that being said, you know, jack smith really want withs the try this case before the election. david yeah. he's salivating matt whitaker, thank you so much for being here. good seeing you. >> good sewing you. david: it is going to be a tough day on wall street at least after the opening bell. we've got all the futures down significantly. dow is down 484, nasdaq's down 316. the opening bell's next. ♪ this is how we roll ♪ (husband) we just want to have enough money for retirement....
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here was a little bit of the jack smith side punching back. take a listen. >> the reason why there have not been prior criminal prosecutions is that there were not crimes. what is important is that no public official has had the absolute criminal immunity that my friend thinks of. he's supposed to be faithful to the laws of the united states and the constitution of the united states and making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. >> joyce, your thoughts about what he was dealing with on that bench, because as i mentioned, the emphasis on everything but now i found suspicious. the number of justices who want to talk about history and we're writing for the future and not deal with what he says there. you're never getting prosecuted for a good faith mistake. you have to have criminal intent. this is black letter law. here you're not fdr dealing with a war. you've got 20 days or whatever left, you have a president-elect lawfully certified and you're trying to steal the thing. >> so appellate argument is very different from ar
here was a little bit of the jack smith side punching back. take a listen. >> the reason why there have not been prior criminal prosecutions is that there were not crimes. what is important is that no public official has had the absolute criminal immunity that my friend thinks of. he's supposed to be faithful to the laws of the united states and the constitution of the united states and making a mistake is not what lands you in a criminal prosecution. >> joyce, your thoughts about...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 6
trump categorically loses this case, each passing week makes it more challenging for jack smith, the special counsel in this case, to complete his trial before the election. it's also possible the court's ruling, even if issued promptly, will inject additional legal complications into this case that then takes more time to sort out. once again, the trial is delayed. adam liptak, if you want to read
trump categorically loses this case, each passing week makes it more challenging for jack smith, the special counsel in this case, to complete his trial before the election. it's also possible the court's ruling, even if issued promptly, will inject additional legal complications into this case that then takes more time to sort out. once again, the trial is delayed. adam liptak, if you want to read
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
does it go away or can jack smith still prosecute him? >> jack smith says if there is partial idea of immunity, the case can proceed. i disagree. there need to be determination if conduct charged in january 6 fall in outer perimeter or whatever the court sets before you can proceed. question of immunity for a president is significant, how can you second guess them. that is what the court has to grapple with. >> carley: on the hush money tr trial, day seven today, they took their wednesday recess yesterday. on tuesday, prosecutors revealed conspiracy to promote election, where is this going? >> very interest ing finding, trump is charged with felony he fa falsified records. prose prosecutors allege if is new york law, which is expired misdemeanor. to say felonious conduct s, no specificity about what conduct he took to wrongfully promote an election. they have to show he falsified record and did so to promote election through conspiracy. it is becoming contro vo luted, that is newest theory. >> carley: you are teaching us about hush money
does it go away or can jack smith still prosecute him? >> jack smith says if there is partial idea of immunity, the case can proceed. i disagree. there need to be determination if conduct charged in january 6 fall in outer perimeter or whatever the court sets before you can proceed. question of immunity for a president is significant, how can you second guess them. that is what the court has to grapple with. >> carley: on the hush money tr trial, day seven today, they took their...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but, they used a grand jury, jack smith did to get that information. she said that is why we need a trial. a trial would be the first solution but your solution is the second best one, which would allow the evidence to get before the american people. >> mike pence, take the stand. tell us what happened. all of the, bill barr, take the stand. eric hirschman, lawyer in the white house, take the stand. it is at least a way, it is not a full trial but it is a hearing and that is a way at least to get some of the evidence before the public. >> andrew, do you agree with me that all nine justices, there wasn't a justice who said that a solution is an improper one? >> exactly. >> so, neil, there remains, though, when i listen to judge amy coney barrett, it also, there is also this other question, which is a certain amount of this is performative. you don't get the feeling that samuel alito is really looking for an answer that can change what he was thinking when he walked in there today. i don't mean to pick on him, it can happen with anyone of the justices at
but, they used a grand jury, jack smith did to get that information. she said that is why we need a trial. a trial would be the first solution but your solution is the second best one, which would allow the evidence to get before the american people. >> mike pence, take the stand. tell us what happened. all of the, bill barr, take the stand. eric hirschman, lawyer in the white house, take the stand. it is at least a way, it is not a full trial but it is a hearing and that is a way at...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he represents special counsel jack smith. putting that out there bribery, treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election and perpetuate himself in power. this is the entire ball game. it's not something you can slice in half and come up with a tidier way that keeps you out of the politics -- >> if you're someone who studied the 2025 project, the platform for a second term term, there is no separation at the policy level between trump, the private person who would act, and trump the wannabe resident again in his official acts. they are together officially and publicly. when he ran the first time, to unearth what he really wanted to do with the border. it was a scoop and leak that led to the store we know about and covered the part to do illegal things at the border. it's in a document and you can keyword search it and the official and private acts of the second term agenda. what they do doesn't just matter in terms of the first-ever file and transfer of power in america havin
he represents special counsel jack smith. putting that out there bribery, treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election and perpetuate himself in power. this is the entire ball game. it's not something you can slice in half and come up with a tidier way that keeps you out of the politics -- >> if you're someone who studied the 2025 project, the platform for a second term term, there is no separation at the policy level between trump,...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and certainly not on the timeframe that jack smith wants. there is a lot of interesting questions raised by the court here on both sides of the aisle. they have a lot to sort through and muddle through, really, given the lack of caselaw law they have to rely on. and it is very likely that they send this back down for some clarification and some of these points regarding the prosecution. christian: this issue of whether acts were committed uer official duties, it is an important point. you can see why the supreme court wants to get this right. if you back to the case of george w. bush at the -- at the time of the iraq invasion, he went into iraq without a u.n. resolution, there were some people who wanted to bring a prosecution against him on crimes of aggression. it would be limiting for a president, if there was not immunity, for some acts that were carried out within official duties. sara yeah, that's right. trump's team raises some legitimate points here, legitimate arguments about essentially stunting the ability of the president to do t
and certainly not on the timeframe that jack smith wants. there is a lot of interesting questions raised by the court here on both sides of the aisle. they have a lot to sort through and muddle through, really, given the lack of caselaw law they have to rely on. and it is very likely that they send this back down for some clarification and some of these points regarding the prosecution. christian: this issue of whether acts were committed uer official duties, it is an important point. you can...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith says it happened after he was president. here is what the former president said an hour and a half ago. >> we have a big case today on presidential immunity. a president has to have immunity or you have a ceremonial president. >> this case was supposed to go to trial in early may, it was delayed. arguing for special counsel is michael dreebben, who was on robert mueller's team. and john sour worked for former president trump, former law clerk to late justice scalia. if rule in favor of special counsel jack smith itten moos the trial will be back on, engines kick back on. we probably won't go to trial for several months, it's been paused at district court level. if they rule in favor of donald trump, don't expect to see a trial at all. we should have a decision by end of june, at latest, it is possible it could be in the next several weeks. it is not something that will be decided if a few days. >> bring in jonathan turley, law professor. professor turley, old saying bad case makes bad case law. are we setting up bad case law
jack smith says it happened after he was president. here is what the former president said an hour and a half ago. >> we have a big case today on presidential immunity. a president has to have immunity or you have a ceremonial president. >> this case was supposed to go to trial in early may, it was delayed. arguing for special counsel is michael dreebben, who was on robert mueller's team. and john sour worked for former president trump, former law clerk to late justice scalia. if...
0
0.0
Apr 20, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. - there are three other cases involving donald trump, the federal case by jack smith on january 6th, the documents case, of the classified documents that were taken from the white house, and the georgia election interference case. what are the chances, in your view, that any of these will ce to trial before the election? - dwindling by the day. you know, you could imagine, we have a big timer here and-- - a timer for the election, you mean? - yeah, and it's counting down. it would have been great, and i think it would have been possible for some of these other trials to have started and to have concluded, certainly by september. and i think that would've been really useful information for the american electorate to have. like, these are situations of disputed facts. the jury system is the system in the anglo-american legal tradition for resolving disputed facts. we're not going to have that opportunity, i think, which is really unfortunate. it means that each american is going to have to resolve those facts for herself, and likely will do that in the confines of the ballot booth, no
. - there are three other cases involving donald trump, the federal case by jack smith on january 6th, the documents case, of the classified documents that were taken from the white house, and the georgia election interference case. what are the chances, in your view, that any of these will ce to trial before the election? - dwindling by the day. you know, you could imagine, we have a big timer here and-- - a timer for the election, you mean? - yeah, and it's counting down. it would have been...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
last year, a special counsel jack smith charged the former president for allegedly attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election. but trump claimed immunity under the constitution of judges. don't agree with him. the case will against the case against him. well, had the trial as the history making set of allegations last august, former president trump was charged with 4 accounts of conspiracy and instruction by the justice department. special counsel jack smith today and then dining room was an sealed charging donald j. trump, with conspiring to defraud the united states, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding. but trump legal team argues he should be protected by presidential immunity. the claim, many legal experts are skeptical about. he doesn't have any text in the constitution to rely on, and that's significant because the constitution does grant and unity explicitly to members of the legislature. but it doesn't mention the president, according to his lawyers from who is acting within his official responsibility
last year, a special counsel jack smith charged the former president for allegedly attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election. but trump claimed immunity under the constitution of judges. don't agree with him. the case will against the case against him. well, had the trial as the history making set of allegations last august, former president trump was charged with 4 accounts of conspiracy and instruction by the justice department. special counsel jack smith today and then dining...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> well, i thought it had to be a dispiriting day for special counsel jack smith. he saw one after another of the members of the conservative majority on the court basically signal discomfort with his position, and some degree of alignment with trump's claim that there should be at least some type of immunity or protection for a former president from criminal charges. i have a vivid memory of sitting there and having each of those justices i'm thinking of, just as matt cavanaugh, chief justice john roberts, and justice neil gorsuch, for example, go through one by one and it pretty clear that they were not going to come out in this case the way jack smith wants them to come out. and at that point it is a numbers game that i don't think looks too good for him. >> mark, were you as surprised as i was to hear the lena questioning that came out of some of the more conservative justices, like matt cavanaugh and neil gorsuch's and samuel alito? >> i was. and the sense that i got from those justices was that to them, to their minds, the real threat to democracy was not tru
. >> well, i thought it had to be a dispiriting day for special counsel jack smith. he saw one after another of the members of the conservative majority on the court basically signal discomfort with his position, and some degree of alignment with trump's claim that there should be at least some type of immunity or protection for a former president from criminal charges. i have a vivid memory of sitting there and having each of those justices i'm thinking of, just as matt cavanaugh, chief...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the legitimacy of the appointment of jack smith. that is not even before the court. and thomas asked about that. he remain it is most mysterious on the court today. we don't know what he thought. >> i think his jenny was showing. when you work for a president, you know these are just guys and girls and these particular guys consume all of this. and what was clear today, they will direct quote segments from all of these programs. alito gives speeches in front of conservatives and i'm sure conservatives in the audience who don't watch our programs are like what is he talking about. they are bound to trump in their feelings of being persecuted. they found common cause with the feeling of persecution. what is amazing to me as a nonlawyer is a federal judge carter out in california was like the further we get, the murmur key it gets but in the immediate aftermath, trump clearly committed the crimes and federal judges said more likely than not he committed felonies. him and that eastman guy. the further we get, the the more the people of the highest levels, the court held.
the legitimacy of the appointment of jack smith. that is not even before the court. and thomas asked about that. he remain it is most mysterious on the court today. we don't know what he thought. >> i think his jenny was showing. when you work for a president, you know these are just guys and girls and these particular guys consume all of this. and what was clear today, they will direct quote segments from all of these programs. alito gives speeches in front of conservatives and i'm sure...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
according to jack smith, only one person is criminally liable for all the fake electors. only donald trump, nobody else, according to fani willis, donald trump committed a crime and some of the georgia electors dead, but not others, according to the indictment, we see tonight. and another one of the states only the electors are liable, not donald trump, according to other states, no electors, nobody's criminally liable. this doesn't make any sense. come together. it's become a pylon. it's become chaos. and by the way, on top of all this, not a single one of these indictments which came three years after the fact has resulted in a single guilty plea or conviction to any serious or any felony case. i need to see the proof in the pudding before i'm at all impressed by any of these, well jam, the other aspect of that could be, well, there's no coordination then there's not the sort of conspiring least among prosecutors to have one consistent theme. >> each side averaging something different. what do you say to this? >> well, let me look to our show if you want to get into all
according to jack smith, only one person is criminally liable for all the fake electors. only donald trump, nobody else, according to fani willis, donald trump committed a crime and some of the georgia electors dead, but not others, according to the indictment, we see tonight. and another one of the states only the electors are liable, not donald trump, according to other states, no electors, nobody's criminally liable. this doesn't make any sense. come together. it's become a pylon. it's...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we saw one of the supreme court this week where the court was skeptical about the ability of jack smith to bring some of these charges, they been stretched to such a limit the question is law. whether or not the people who really are interfering in the election are those bringing suit for the sole purpose of tearing down the private opponent in a campaign potentially even jailing him prior to the election so they can keep our. >> these court cases against trump are all out will assault connected to the biden white house to stop the political rival trump. the courts to knock out and gager opponent. let's not america. >> it's just a real problem. we are used to hearing other countries do things like this. the fact that we have so many in the press corps right now on this situation because there's a short term thinking going on in my was one of the things that was so important the supreme court talked about this week, the person arguing on behalf of jack smith wanted to talk about the specifics of this case and suggested is one time figure will never deal with this again and the court want
we saw one of the supreme court this week where the court was skeptical about the ability of jack smith to bring some of these charges, they been stretched to such a limit the question is law. whether or not the people who really are interfering in the election are those bringing suit for the sole purpose of tearing down the private opponent in a campaign potentially even jailing him prior to the election so they can keep our. >> these court cases against trump are all out will assault...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
watch for the argument about whether or not jack smith has the authority to indict president trump. as to the immunity question, presidents have immunity for a reason. we have a separation of pours here. you don't want article 3 courts under the constitution overseeing the behavior of the president article 2 presidency here and there is a real concern by the u.s. supreme court i sus be expect to make sure the lines between the different branches of government are not violated in such a way that that violate separation of powers. that will be the big decision on thursday. maria: do you think we'll get the decision on thursday. >> i think they'll issue you the decision on presidential immunity by the end of june. maria: thank you, sir. quick break and then how much are you willing to pay for a cup of joe. jeff flock is live from a coffee shop in philadelphia this morning with more on that. jeff. >> reporter: unlimited, maria. that's what you're willing to pay. yeah, i'll tell you, coffee, i got my eyes opened this morning. can you smell that? look at the beans there. yeah. we're willi
watch for the argument about whether or not jack smith has the authority to indict president trump. as to the immunity question, presidents have immunity for a reason. we have a separation of pours here. you don't want article 3 courts under the constitution overseeing the behavior of the president article 2 presidency here and there is a real concern by the u.s. supreme court i sus be expect to make sure the lines between the different branches of government are not violated in such a way that...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
both donald trump & jack smith, their lawyers point to history the constitution, both saying that it works in their favor for donald trump's side. he says separation of powers. the idea that the three branches are independent of each other means that judges cannot sit in judgment of the former president, whereas jack smith are used that there was never any kind of criminal immunity foreseen by the framers of the constitution. any points to a more modern day precedent? that involves former president richard nixon, who was forced out of office in 1974 because of his actions during the watergate scandal and his own effort to try to ensure his reelection back in 1972 but in 1974, after he was forced out, then president gerald ford pardoned richard nixon. and that pardon jack smith argues, was a recognition that nixon could have been subject to criminal prosecution if he had not been pardoned. so those are the dueling arguments the justices will hear. but bottom line, this trial of donald trump in this particular case has already been postponed since its original march start date because
both donald trump & jack smith, their lawyers point to history the constitution, both saying that it works in their favor for donald trump's side. he says separation of powers. the idea that the three branches are independent of each other means that judges cannot sit in judgment of the former president, whereas jack smith are used that there was never any kind of criminal immunity foreseen by the framers of the constitution. any points to a more modern day precedent? that involves former...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the prosecutor jack smith and justice department was grilled for nearly twice that amount of time. but almost immediately at the start of proceedings, under questioning, we got confirmation that the appeals court hypothetical, that crazy hypothetical about trump being able to assassinate political enemies and never be charged, we got confirmation at the start that that was not a fluke. president trump maintains and his lawyers maintain that he really is immune from prosecution, specifically for killing his political rivals. >> i'm going to give you a chance to say if you stay by it. if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military or order someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts from which he can get immunity? >> it would depend on the hypothetical, but we could see that could be an official act. >> it could and why? >> that could be an official act, really? you might officially as part of his duties want to kill his domestic political rival and if it is an official act, trump's lawyers say he is immune from prosecution. in
the prosecutor jack smith and justice department was grilled for nearly twice that amount of time. but almost immediately at the start of proceedings, under questioning, we got confirmation that the appeals court hypothetical, that crazy hypothetical about trump being able to assassinate political enemies and never be charged, we got confirmation at the start that that was not a fluke. president trump maintains and his lawyers maintain that he really is immune from prosecution, specifically for...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i think the reason jack smith is waiting in the d.c. case is because he wants to bang out the trump case, resolve it. then he'll go after the unindicted co-conspirators, but just because you're an an unindicted co-conspirator doesn't necessarily mean you'll be indicts, a lot of moving pieces. >> not necessarily, but he's now facing this on top of 88 criminal charges. if you were on donald trump's big legal team, some in new york tomorrow, some in d.c., what are you telling him tonight? >> please don't fire me, but in addition to that, look, this does -- >> why would he? he needs them now more than ever. >> no. but it's a good way to get a delay. >> explain that. >> one thing someone does for a last gasp effort to get a delay is fire their counsel which they're permitted to do and say i've got my new counsel and i need that person to get up to speed. judge merchan will not permit it and say, you have two counsel there, it will be fine. this big diagram, two cohorts indicted people. the 11 folks in arizona who are unlike the trump loyalis
>> i think the reason jack smith is waiting in the d.c. case is because he wants to bang out the trump case, resolve it. then he'll go after the unindicted co-conspirators, but just because you're an an unindicted co-conspirator doesn't necessarily mean you'll be indicts, a lot of moving pieces. >> not necessarily, but he's now facing this on top of 88 criminal charges. if you were on donald trump's big legal team, some in new york tomorrow, some in d.c., what are you telling him...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the attorney for special counsel jack smith, who is prosecuting the attempts to overturn the election, pushed back against claims that donald trump's efforts amounted to "official acts" as president, but the chiefjustice did push back, reminding the special counsel how easy it is for a prosecutor to get a grand jury to bring an indictment. relying on the good faith of the prosecutor may not be enough in some cases, he said. we will talk about events in new york shortly. our correspondent nada tawfik will bring us up to date on the hush money case and the evidence we have been hearing today, but let's focus on the supreme court. gary o'donoghue has been carrying that angle for us. gary, as we have set out, the justices appeared sceptical of his claim of absolute immunity, but there is a question that needs to be answered, do the allegations in the indictment fall under official acts of the presidency or not? why is that relevant?— of the presidency or not? why is that relevant? because there is a distinction being _ that relevant? because there is a distinction being drawn _ that rel
the attorney for special counsel jack smith, who is prosecuting the attempts to overturn the election, pushed back against claims that donald trump's efforts amounted to "official acts" as president, but the chiefjustice did push back, reminding the special counsel how easy it is for a prosecutor to get a grand jury to bring an indictment. relying on the good faith of the prosecutor may not be enough in some cases, he said. we will talk about events in new york shortly. our...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i don't think anybody has thought of so far that jack smith could do. i don't want to put any idea i sat in his head because i hate this prosecution. prosecution r. fai i think it's unconstitutional and i think it's wrong. bu would be interestingsee to see if jack smith triedifsm to take that concessioitn and rn with it. i don't know what the courts would do. macoi'm sure, if i would have me that concession. but with all thade that said, m, either you agree that this case now no chance of being triede of wefore november, or at least is that your take? we only have about 10 seconds each. grean secot yeah, i just think to's impossible to get this done. it's inevitable that the supreme court, regardles gets of their precise decision, they got to send it back to thee lower court for findings of fact. at the very leas t by the trial court judge and professor. there's a current indictment. it can't put under the current indictment the cur, can't be trd before the election. but if they amended the indictment to include only the conceded thd publiceitu private
i don't think anybody has thought of so far that jack smith could do. i don't want to put any idea i sat in his head because i hate this prosecution. prosecution r. fai i think it's unconstitutional and i think it's wrong. bu would be interestingsee to see if jack smith triedifsm to take that concessioitn and rn with it. i don't know what the courts would do. macoi'm sure, if i would have me that concession. but with all thade that said, m, either you agree that this case now no chance of being...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was long before jack smith was active. we pressed on how the aides and even lawyers seemed to become directly involved not just making arguments or defending things, which they are allowed to do, but in advancing active work that appeared to break the law, which could be indictable. and these leads that we built on, investigators followed them. here we are in our special right now. i'm going to air that exchange and him ultimately admitting it. not defending its legality but saying he did it with giuliani. that is trying to put in false electors and we're airing this in the full context, about 90 seconds from the original interview and you will hear him admit the very elector plan that he's indicted for this week in arizona. >> there's also been reporting about the attempt to seat fraud due lent electors. is that something you worked on or would support in michigan? >> that's so funny. >> not fraudulent. >> we fought to seat the electors. the trump campaign asked us to do that. did you ever make calls like that regarding w
it was long before jack smith was active. we pressed on how the aides and even lawyers seemed to become directly involved not just making arguments or defending things, which they are allowed to do, but in advancing active work that appeared to break the law, which could be indictable. and these leads that we built on, investigators followed them. here we are in our special right now. i'm going to air that exchange and him ultimately admitting it. not defending its legality but saying he did it...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for the specifics, jack smith's operation has been clear. the stuff that happened on january 6th is inherently not about the acts of the presidency because trump had lost. he'd lost the election. therefore, it is not a presidential act, and, therefore, he should not get immunity for it. whether the justices see it that way is a whole other matter. look, i think this is pretty evident that what is happening here is trump's team wants to just muck things up. i don't think that there is anything more to it. they want to delay it. way that i want to get this out from the election. ideally, they want to see trump win and dispense with the matter. i think the "journal's" editorial, there is nothing debatable or objectionable about it. of course, presidents should have some level of immunity for acts they take in office. the question is whether it should be blanket immunity. i think on that front, the vast majority of the legal profession is on one side, saying, no, there should not be blanket immu immunity. >> muck things sup a technical, legal te
for the specifics, jack smith's operation has been clear. the stuff that happened on january 6th is inherently not about the acts of the presidency because trump had lost. he'd lost the election. therefore, it is not a presidential act, and, therefore, he should not get immunity for it. whether the justices see it that way is a whole other matter. look, i think this is pretty evident that what is happening here is trump's team wants to just muck things up. i don't think that there is anything...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
disaster for the special counsel jack smith. at least five of the court's republicans seemed eager at the very least to trump delay federal criminal trial adding that the justice who seemed to hedge the most, john roberts, also seemed to think that trump enjoys at least some immunity from criminal prosecution joining us now. chris landau. chris, is there real reason for the left to be in despair tonight? >> i think it was a good day for former president trump in the supreme court, laura. but i think that's just because he's got the law and common sense on his side. i mean, this is -- the question as you just read is whether a president can be subjected to criminal liability after leaving office for official acts, right? nobody is arguing here about the president's being immune for private acts. right? so, you know, murder, speeding, whatever. the thing is, if we cross the rubicon of saying that our presidents can be criminally charged for their official acts, we don't have a country anymore. i mean, how is a president -- how is
disaster for the special counsel jack smith. at least five of the court's republicans seemed eager at the very least to trump delay federal criminal trial adding that the justice who seemed to hedge the most, john roberts, also seemed to think that trump enjoys at least some immunity from criminal prosecution joining us now. chris landau. chris, is there real reason for the left to be in despair tonight? >> i think it was a good day for former president trump in the supreme court, laura....
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is for actions arising from foreign affairs jack smith even dropped a footnote into one of his brief saying, there are certain circumstances it says that as commander in chief dealing with foreign powers, there might be some actions taken that could be perhaps criminally suspected war crimes, but, but what he says, those are specific instances that would not are not here if the president is going to b immune from anything. the one thing he will not be immune from his election center footnote some more than i think it doesn't four-star generals help file an abacus brief basically saying, look, no this is not what we want and they were actually arguing against what the president is saying about why until immunity. well, they're saying in fact, they note the threat of authoritarianism or around the world. they also talk about the ability to protect elections from candidates who may hold on to whether they have won or lost. these are the kinds of things that are going to resurface in this conversation over the next couple of days and the thing you pointed out that i'm pretty obsessed wit
is for actions arising from foreign affairs jack smith even dropped a footnote into one of his brief saying, there are certain circumstances it says that as commander in chief dealing with foreign powers, there might be some actions taken that could be perhaps criminally suspected war crimes, but, but what he says, those are specific instances that would not are not here if the president is going to b immune from anything. the one thing he will not be immune from his election center footnote...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but that's what special counsel jack smith asked for. he actually said the justices should expedite this case so that they could have a decision by the end of the term. so that's what they're doing to do. whether or not this is going to go past too long before an election will be held in november, that's going to be up to how the court writes it and whether there are still issues left for lower courts to resolve. norah. >> really interesting. jan crawford, thank you. >>> instead of being at those supreme court hearings, donald trump was in a courthouse in lower manhattan for his so-called hush money trial. that's where we find cbs's robert costa. good evening, robert. >> reporter: good evening, norah. former president donald trump isn't attacking david pecker, the former publisher of the "national enquirer," just yet, but pecker's testimony here today in lower manhattan could threaten trump, offering new details about an alleged catch and kill operation to influence the 2016 election. this morning, former president trump weighed in on a
but that's what special counsel jack smith asked for. he actually said the justices should expedite this case so that they could have a decision by the end of the term. so that's what they're doing to do. whether or not this is going to go past too long before an election will be held in november, that's going to be up to how the court writes it and whether there are still issues left for lower courts to resolve. norah. >> really interesting. jan crawford, thank you. >>> instead...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith, the special counsel prosecuting donald trump for his attempt to overturn the 2020 election and the events around january 6, the attack on the capital, he said no one is above the law. that is what the justices have been working with. they i think were skeptical of the idea of total immunity from prosecution. that may be bad news for donald they also made a distention between acts done as a private citizen for private reasons and acts done as official, as a part of the official job. that may mean they will push this back down to the lower courts, which could delay the case even further. we are already looking at a very tight timetable for jack smith the special counsel to bring this case before the election. of course, we also know, don't we, if donald trump were to win november's election, in this case still hanging over him, he could simply ask the justice department to drop it. caitriona: gary at the u.s. supreme court and manhattan, thank you both for joining us. with me now and studio is marcus childress, the former investigative council for the congressional committee
jack smith, the special counsel prosecuting donald trump for his attempt to overturn the 2020 election and the events around january 6, the attack on the capital, he said no one is above the law. that is what the justices have been working with. they i think were skeptical of the idea of total immunity from prosecution. that may be bad news for donald they also made a distention between acts done as a private citizen for private reasons and acts done as official, as a part of the official job....
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> here he is questioning the internal representative special counsel, jack smith. >> does the president have immunity or are you saying there is no immunity or presidential immunity even for official acts? >> yes justice thomas but it is also important to put in perspective the position that we are offering the court today. the president as the head of the article to branch can assert as applied article two objections to criminal laws that it interfere with an official power presented by the president or prevents the president from accomplishing his constitutionally assigned functions. >> the clock is ticking. end of june we should hear something, it could be sooner. here is? >> harris: all right. there are protesters everywhere these days. david, thank you very much. so, kayleigh mceany, you and i got into a detailed conversation this idea of official acts versus private acts. let's bring the audience into our conversation on that. >> kayleigh: this was huge and this is a press of what we've heard if i'm trump and i watch this, i feel good about what i've learned. about these justices,
. >> here he is questioning the internal representative special counsel, jack smith. >> does the president have immunity or are you saying there is no immunity or presidential immunity even for official acts? >> yes justice thomas but it is also important to put in perspective the position that we are offering the court today. the president as the head of the article to branch can assert as applied article two objections to criminal laws that it interfere with an official...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the special counsel, jack smith, is arguing that donald trump has never been above the law trump's lawyers argued that what he did to try to overturn the election results was part of his official duties as president, and he he shouldn't be prosecuted presidents have to be given total immunity they have to be allowed to do the job in arguing that he has presidential immunity. >> donald trump says, if former president's could be criminally prosecuted for official acts they took as president that threat would loom over everything. president's do they have to make decisions and they have to make them free of all terror that can be rained upon them when they leave office or even before they leave office. >> trump's making that argument before the supreme court in the january 6 election subversion case brought by special counsel, jack smith who counters trump's argument by saying, no one is above the law the idea that somebody can commit crimes in the oval office. >> and then in perpetuity for the rest of their life, escape all accountability is inimical to american law and the constitution, the
the special counsel, jack smith, is arguing that donald trump has never been above the law trump's lawyers argued that what he did to try to overturn the election results was part of his official duties as president, and he he shouldn't be prosecuted presidents have to be given total immunity they have to be allowed to do the job in arguing that he has presidential immunity. >> donald trump says, if former president's could be criminally prosecuted for official acts they took as president...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith was forced to unredacted. you've been looking through them, what are they show with regards to this coordination between the biden white house, the librarian and the justice department? >> when the governments reductions are removed and the curtain comes down, it's very telling and it's very telling how ugly it really was at the time that president donald trump was leaving the oval office. just moments after he left there was no question because of the revelations that are telling within these documents that there was an orchestrated effort between the white house and the national archives to zero in on trump and basically orchestrate a story to suggest that donald trump and his team were noncomplying or not willing to cooperate. the irony and hypocrisy of that is that gary stern who is almost a 25 year veteran for the national archives drafted an e-mail and explained that it is generally a very chaotic time when you have a one term transition and it hadn't even completed the electronic transfer of the trump a
jack smith was forced to unredacted. you've been looking through them, what are they show with regards to this coordination between the biden white house, the librarian and the justice department? >> when the governments reductions are removed and the curtain comes down, it's very telling and it's very telling how ugly it really was at the time that president donald trump was leaving the oval office. just moments after he left there was no question because of the revelations that are...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the take was oral argument was disaster for special counsel jack smith. at least 5-quart republican seemed eager to o the very leasg to permit trump to delay, criminal trial adding the trust does seem to hedged the mostme john roberts also seem toec think that trump enjoys some immunity from federal prosecution. a little bit about the argued cases and clerk for is justice scalia and thomas. chris, is the real reason for the left to be in despair tonight customer >> i think it was a good day for former president trump info t i supreme court court, laura. but i think that is because he's got the law and common sense on his side. i i mean, this is -- the questiont edas you just read is whether aa president can bevi subjected toh criminal liability after leavine office for official acts, right? nobody is arguing here about the president's being immune for private acts.th so, murder, speeding, whatever. but the thing is, if we crossedn the rubicon of saying that our presidents can bche criminallyon charged with for their official acts, we don't h have a countr
the take was oral argument was disaster for special counsel jack smith. at least 5-quart republican seemed eager to o the very leasg to permit trump to delay, criminal trial adding the trust does seem to hedged the mostme john roberts also seem toec think that trump enjoys some immunity from federal prosecution. a little bit about the argued cases and clerk for is justice scalia and thomas. chris, is the real reason for the left to be in despair tonight customer >> i think it was a good...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court today majority sounded like they may limit special counsel jack smith's 2020 case against former president trump. presidential immunity. what does it mean now? >> it's interesting because it didn't seemed like a large majority of the core certainly got there has to be some residential immunity for official acts. i think before this case was brought, these cases were brought against president trump most people assumed presidents had immunity for official acts like others like the speech and debate class but these cases are extraordinary brought against the president and the arguments today suggested the president trump will give a strong ruling for majority of the supreme court that at least his official act are immune from criminal prosecution. the question becomes which official act -- >> let's show the new york times headline because even the new york times is saying it so what do you think about where you come down on this? >> i think that's right, a court majority probably have a five -- four, extension three official acts police have immunity and they're going to send
supreme court today majority sounded like they may limit special counsel jack smith's 2020 case against former president trump. presidential immunity. what does it mean now? >> it's interesting because it didn't seemed like a large majority of the core certainly got there has to be some residential immunity for official acts. i think before this case was brought, these cases were brought against president trump most people assumed presidents had immunity for official acts like others like...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith, the special counsel prosecuting donald trump for his attempt to overturn the 2020 election and the events around january 6, the attack on the capital, he said no one is above the law. that is what the justices have been working with. they i think were skeptical of the idea of total immunity from prosecution. that may be bad news for donald trump. they also made a distention between acts done as a private citizen for private reasons and acts done as official, as a part of the official job. that may mean they will push this back down to the lower courts, which could delay the case even further. we are already looking at a very tight timetable for jack smith the special counsel to bring this case before the election. of course, we also know, don't we, if donald trump were to win november's election, in this case still hanging over him, he could simply ask the justice department to drop it. caitriona: gary at the u.s. supreme court and manhattan, thank you both for joining us. with me now and studio is marcus childress, the former investigative council for the congressional com
jack smith, the special counsel prosecuting donald trump for his attempt to overturn the 2020 election and the events around january 6, the attack on the capital, he said no one is above the law. that is what the justices have been working with. they i think were skeptical of the idea of total immunity from prosecution. that may be bad news for donald trump. they also made a distention between acts done as a private citizen for private reasons and acts done as official, as a part of the...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think the reason jack smith is waiting in the d.c. case is because he wants to bang out the trump case, resolve it, then he will go after the unindicted co-conspirators but let me add this to complicate matters even more. just because you are an unindicted co-conspirator does not mean you will necessarily be indicted. like i say, lots of moving pieces. >> okay, not necessarily, but he is now facing this on top of 88 criminal charges. if you are on donald trump's big legal team -- he has some in new york tomorrow, he has some in d.c., what are you telling them tonight? >> please don't fire me but look -- >> why would he? he needs the help more than ever. >> but it's a good way to get a delay. one thing that someone does for a lastgasp effort to get a delay is fire their counsel, which they are permitted to do than say i've got my new council and i need that person to get up to speed. judge merchan will not permit it. he will say you have to keep counsel there. it will be fine but let me get back to this big diagram and try to simplify
i think the reason jack smith is waiting in the d.c. case is because he wants to bang out the trump case, resolve it, then he will go after the unindicted co-conspirators but let me add this to complicate matters even more. just because you are an unindicted co-conspirator does not mean you will necessarily be indicted. like i say, lots of moving pieces. >> okay, not necessarily, but he is now facing this on top of 88 criminal charges. if you are on donald trump's big legal team -- he has...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith wants one before the election. >> dana: david spunt in washington, d.c. for us. thank you so much. joining us for more on all this is attorney will sharp. he is on the legal team representing former president trump before the u.s. supreme court and a candidate for missouri attorney general. thank you for making time for us today. david axelrod was a campaign consultant and worked in the white house for obama. he now has a big podcast and tweeted this yesterday. based oh than what we heard today from scotus it may seem trump may skate past the election without standing trial on the january 6th charges. if so the new york city trial is likely the only he will face pre-november. under the circumstances the best scenario he could have hoped for. how do you see it? >> we were certainly optimistic coming out of the supreme court yesterday. they seem to be taking this issue of presidential immunity, the scope of presidential immunity, very seriously and they seemed very receptive to our arguments without a robust presidential immunity for a president's official acts in
jack smith wants one before the election. >> dana: david spunt in washington, d.c. for us. thank you so much. joining us for more on all this is attorney will sharp. he is on the legal team representing former president trump before the u.s. supreme court and a candidate for missouri attorney general. thank you for making time for us today. david axelrod was a campaign consultant and worked in the white house for obama. he now has a big podcast and tweeted this yesterday. based oh than...
0
0.0
Apr 21, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
deranged jack smith, the whole group of them. i think you will see some big changes being made. >> [shouting] mr. trump: you know what we are going to be doing? we are going to be saving america. our country is under siege. take a look at israel. it doesn't feel protected. biden doesn't know where he is. it is a real mess. >> [shouting] mr. trump: we will see what happens. >> to debrief you on his plan [inaudible] mr. trump: thank you. >> [shouting] [crowd cheering, shouting, clapping] >> [crowd chanting] usa! usa! usa! mr. trump: they come in with guns. ok? it is not good. he is going to be a movie star, you know that. forget about bodegas. he will be a movie star. we will send him to hollywood. goodbye, everybody. >> what is your plan for the rest of your time in new york? >> mr. president. >> [shouting] >> [crowd chanting] thank you. thank you. thank you. >> [shouting] >> mr. trump. mr. trump: we are going to go all over. weekends we are doing rallies all over the place. we have never had higher numbers than we have now. highe
deranged jack smith, the whole group of them. i think you will see some big changes being made. >> [shouting] mr. trump: you know what we are going to be doing? we are going to be saving america. our country is under siege. take a look at israel. it doesn't feel protected. biden doesn't know where he is. it is a real mess. >> [shouting] mr. trump: we will see what happens. >> to debrief you on his plan [inaudible] mr. trump: thank you. >> [shouting] [crowd cheering,...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jack smith sought to fast track this case. maybe not having a trial, maybe not airing the evidence in front of the american people before an election to decide, you guessed it, who will be our president. make no mistake. whether or not trump prevails this particular appeal does nothing to change a fact that the nation's highest court has already done the disgraced ex-president a solid in terms of the timeline, the schedule. big favor. they have gift wrapped and otherwise unavailable delay for him. they've shown the country, the public, the 60% of americans who don't think much of them anymore. they've shown an ability to move quickly when he asked them to. so here we go. foundational principle under consideration, the future of our democracy at stake. it's where we start the hour with some of our favorite experts and friends. u.s. special correspondent for bbc studios katty kay is here. joining us rnc spam, host of the bulwark podcast tim miller is here. back with me at the table former official at the department of justice, m
jack smith sought to fast track this case. maybe not having a trial, maybe not airing the evidence in front of the american people before an election to decide, you guessed it, who will be our president. make no mistake. whether or not trump prevails this particular appeal does nothing to change a fact that the nation's highest court has already done the disgraced ex-president a solid in terms of the timeline, the schedule. big favor. they have gift wrapped and otherwise unavailable delay for...